Paul Feyerabend, Against Method (London: New Left Books, 1975).ġ2. Mary Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966).ġ1. For the most systematic treatment to date of this aspect of deconstruction, see Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973).ġ0. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), postscript.ĩ. Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Two incommensurable theories are not comparable because neither entailment nor contradiction obtain between sentences in one such theory and those in another. Michael Dummett, Truth and Other Enigmas (London: Duckworth, 1978).Ĩ. Bas van Fraassen, The Scientific Image (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980).ħ. Alexander Nehamas, 'The Postulated Author: Critical Monism as a Regulative Ideal,' Critical Inquiry 7 (1981): 133-49.Ħ. Spivak (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).ĥ. anonymous (New York: Random House, 1973) Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Smith (Boston: Beacon Press, 1967) Michel Foucault, The Order of Things, trans. I take the seminal texts of deconstruction to be three: Roland Barthes, Writing Degree Zero, trans.

13 Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), Part Three.Ĥ.

Ian Hacking, Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), chap. Seung, Structuralism and Hermeneutics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982).ģ. Charles Altieri, Act and Quality (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1981) T. Frank Lentricchia, After the New Criticism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Ģ.

Return to base english subtitles